We are living in
the days of the university; at least we were before the huge rise in tuition
fees came along and made attendance at an institution of higher education an
unaffordable and unreachable goal for many families.
From
1995 to 2008 the UK's university population doubled, with as many as 40% going
into higher education, up from 20%. The numbers are unsurprisingly skewed when
it comes to class; in London's upmarket boroughs of Chelsea and Kensington, the
figure for young people attending university is closer to the 80% mark.
Unaffordable Fees?
There
is obvious outrage at the raising of fees that puts those on average or lower incomes
out of the running for places; especially after the huge boost in the last
twenty years of university goers and the importance government and the
education system seems to place on degrees. There is a question, however, over
just how necessary holding a degree is to securing a bright and profitable
career.
Figures
show that at the end of 2011 almost 19% of those who had graduated in the previous
two years were unemployed and 33% of those who had graduated in the last six
years were in low-skilled, poor-income jobs. Obviously with so many holding a
degree the value has been reduced. Add to this the fact that the majority of
degrees are in the arts, a notoriously low-paid work sector, and you begin to
see that perhaps holding a degree isn't all it's cracked up to be.
Why do Schools Encourage Further Education?
Schools
love it when their pupils go to university. They reference the numbers of their
pupils who are admitted with beaming pride, and use those figures as an
indicator of their unquestionable success as a learning establishment.
They
seem to blindly usher their pupils onto a university application conveyor belt,
polishing their smiley young faces as they move along the production line
towards higher education while loudspeakers blare the words 'university good!'
until it sinks in without question.
We should be asking some hard questions now:
·
If the market for degrees is so saturated
are they becoming increasingly obsolete?
·
If so many degree holders are unemployed
after three or four years of hard studying is this the best career path?
·
If they are going to be landing themselves
in thousands of pounds worth of debt they will likely struggle to pay back is
this a practical choice?
·
What other options should pupils consider?
Other Options
The
other options I talk of are entrance into the labour market, and
apprenticeships, though after so much weight and grandeur is placed on the holy
and exalted degree, pupils are unsurprisingly viewing these 'other options'
(not a very catchy or glamorous title for a life choice is it?) as second best.
It is also often difficult for young pupils to correctly assess their strong
and weak points.
A
kid might be infinitely better suited to hands on, interactive learning (a
large proportion of us favour learning this way), but see that the mere mention
of university puts a smile on the teacher's and family's faces, and seems to be
the golden key to the lock of life. He can go three years without applying
himself in the direction best suited to him, and end up with a low-skilled job
he could have gotten without the degree, along with a mountain of debt.
The Re-Emergence of the Traditional Apprenticeship?
The
apprenticeship is a long tradition that has secured skilled work and enduring
careers for the youth of Britain long before the degree found prominence
amongst the masses. For those that opt into it and learn a trade in detail from
the ground up, they are finding themselves considerably better off than a huge
proportion of degree holders. Blair's government finally began to take note of
this, and started building the case for the apprenticeship once again,
something that the current coalition has continued, but to what extent? The
figures, upon first inspection look good – around a 70% increase in apprenticeships
since the last election.
However,
on closer scrutiny the numbers aren't so promising. The notion we have of the
apprenticeship as an in-depth learning tool alongside on-the-job experience in
a skilled trade seems to account for only one in ten of these so-called
apprenticeships, with the other figures spoken for by schemes set up by the
service and retail sector, hospitality and catering.
These
apprenticeships are mostly level one and two.
This means that the apprentice often only receives a couple of hours a
week of off-the-job learning, as opposed to the ten hours a level three
apprentice can put down his Bosch multi-tool blades to enjoy. These lower-level
'apprenticeship' schemes receive incentives from government who fund them and
are happy to boast the impressive looking figures of increased apprenticeships
without providing schemes that enable participants to really benefit and prop
themselves up into a well-paid, skilled career.
So
companies benefit from a grant, government benefits from impressive figures,
but the apprentice winds up in the same, relatively low-skilled work he would
have found anyway, with only marginally greater opportunity for advancement. It
seems like the apprenticeships of old aren't back to their former glory, which is
a sad state of affairs given the other options of low-reward, high-cost degrees
and the low-appeal entry level job market school-leavers now face.
Author
Bio
William
Bancs is a builder by trade who takes on level 3 apprentices who learn how to
properly use the full range of Bosch Multitool Blades on their
way to becoming fully qualified tradesmen.
Read more...
